Redgrave advertised to sell his business premises and a share in his business, representing that it brought in between £300 and £400 a year when it truly grossed less than £200 a year. This comes from the courts of equity; common law takes a different approach. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1. When the practice proved to be "utterly worthless", the purchasing lawyer sued for rescission of the contract. Hurd Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation. Hurd answered the advertisement and enquired as to the income of the practice. In-house law team, Contract law – Misrepresentation – Specific performance. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ. A lawyer agreed to buy a law office from another based on exaggerated representations made on the value of the practice. Court of Appeal of England and Wales cases, https://casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/Redgrave_v_Hurd?oldid=8867. However, when he discovered that the law practice was "utterly worthless" he refused to complete his payments. 26th Jun 2019 Court Mere fact that party misled has had opportunity of investigating and ascertaining whether representation is true will not necessarily deprive that person of right to claim to have been deceived by it. As held in Redgrave v Hurd, if a material representation has been made to the representee than he is said to have relied on the statement by the representor, inducing the contract. He advertised for a partner to join his business and buy the accompanying house. Can a defendant rescind a contract because of a misrepresentation? Facts. Redgrave v Hurd (1881), 20 Ch D 1 Jessel MR and Baggallay and Lush LJJ Defendant Issue The court found that the defendant was not under a duty to inspect the papers and that his reliance on the plaintiff’s misrepresentation was enough. It holds that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. Car and Universal Finance v Caldwell. Redgrave v. Hurd, 20 Ch. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation. WikiMili The Free Encyclopedia Following Redgrave v Hurd, ‘it was not enough to show that the claimant could have discovered the truth’ but that he did in fact discover the truth In the instant case the true position appeared clearly on the face of the documents containing the terms of the contract, and R was an experienced investor and has signed the document. Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! This can be rebutted by proving knowledge to the contrary of the statement, or express proof that the party did not rely on the statement. The judge in the first instance found in favour of the plaintiff and the decision was appealed. Redgrave v Hurd The seller told the buyer that the practice was worth £300 a year and invited him to check this. A matter for the court was to establish the extent of the misrepresentation of the plaintiff and whether the defendant should have been expected to undertake further research into the proposed business by having a look at the accounts which had been presented by the plaintiff. View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch. In-text: (Redgrave v Hurd, [1881]) Your Bibliography: Redgrave v Hurd [1881] 20 Ch. Redgrave Hurd However, as a counter argument, In the case of Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1, Edwin refused to sign the contract because he may be hesitating when he heard that an Arabian Sheik was on the look out for the rare car and is willing to pay $700,000. Redgrave v Hurd [1881] Rees v Darlington Memorial Hospital [2003] Rees v Skerrett [2001] Reeve v Lisle [1902] Reeves v Commissioner of Police [1999] Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] Regis Property Co Ltd v Redman [1956] Renals v Cowlishaw (1879) Revill v Newbery [1996] Rhodes v Macalister (1923) Rhone v Stephens [1994] Rice v Connolly [1966] Jessel states that if it is shown that a representation was made in an attempt to induce a party to enter into a contract, and the contract was in fact formed, then there is a presumption that the representation was relied upon. Redgrave v Hurd 1881 - Court of Appeal. On the basis of what Mr. Redgrave published Mr. Hurd purchased the property and the partnership in the law practice on the premises. In this case the judge finds the misrepresentation to have been innocent. It holds that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. Clough v London and North Western Railway Co (1871) LR 7 Exch 26. Redgrave was successful at trial an… There is a presumption that any statement made in an attempt to induce another party to enter into a contract is relied upon as a condition if the contract is eventually formed. Mr Redgrave showed him summaries that came … Redgrave told Mr Hurd that the law practice brought in £300 per annum, when it was only £200 per annum. VAT Registration No: 842417633. *You can also browse our support articles here >. The court reversed the decision of the trial judge and they allowed the contract to be rescinded on the basis of innocent misrepresentation. Original language version (source reference: cf. The defendant responded and was interviewed at which point he was informed the business was worth £300 per year. Plaintiff In Redgrave v Hurd, 53 false statements were made by the plaintiff about the income of his practice as a solicitor, on the strength of which the defendant had entered into a contract to buy the plaintiff’s house and practice. Can a defendant rescind a contract because of a misrepresentation? The plaintiff argues that the defendant cannot rescind the contract because he simply should have used due diligence and sought more information before purchasing the premises. Rescission can vary depending on the circumstances, ie by notifying the police when a car has been sold to a thief because of a misrepresentation. The defendant then wrote to the solicitor asking the amount of business completed in the last three years. D. 1 (28 November 1881), PrimarySources It holds that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. This can only be refuted by proving that the party hearing the representation had definite knowledge to the contrary, or by explicit evidence that they did not rely on the representation. The court held that the buyer had relied on the seller’s word, even if he had the means to discover it was untrue. In innocent misrepresentations you can only ask for damages if you cannot rescind the contract. 1881 Registered Data Controller No: Z1821391. Looking for a flexible role? However, the judge rejects this and says that the only limitation on suing for a misrepresentation is the limitation period, which starts when the fraud reasonably should have been discovered. Redgrave v Hurd [1881] Uncategorized Legal Case Notes August 23, 2018 May 28, 2019. Company Registration No: 4964706. The plaintiff appealed for specific performance. To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you! Citation 185 (1876) 2 Ch D 663. The Defendant replied and during two interviews, the plaintiff represented that his business was bringing in either about £300 a year, or from £300-£400 a year. 186 Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86. Judgement for the case Redgrave v Hurd R was going to sell H his house at a high value based on the fact that H would also be taking over his solicitor’s practice that he claimed brough in £300 a year. Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! Court of Appeal of England and Wales We also have a number of sample law papers, each written to a specific grade, to illustrate the work delivered by our academic services. Redgrave v. Hurd in that an executory contract had been induced by an innocent misrepresentation as to the profits of a business. Country Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1. Where you have neither evidence that he knew the facts showing that the statement was untrue, or that he did anything to show that he did not rely upon the statement, the inference remains that he relied upon the statement as being a material statement (condition) in the contract. Redgrave v Hurd D. 1 (Court of Appeal). Redgrave v Hurd 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation. However, if these cannot be shown then the contract can be rescinded upon discovery of the fraudulent misrepresentation. In Redgrave v. Hurd, an English contract law case, it was held that, “A contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. Mr Redgrave was an elderly solicitor. The defendant responded to the advertisement and negotiations followed, in which the plaintiff stated that the practice brought him in … He declined the offer to check the accounts and took them at their word. It was held that, although the plaintiff had gone into possession of the land and taken possession of the chattels, the contract was still executory, to … After few years when he realized that the law practice was “absolutely useless“, he refused to make any more payments. Innocent misrepresentations lead to a contract being able to be rescinded. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 A solicitor purchased into the partnership in the solicitors' firm. No inducement if contract entered for independent reasons, It does not matter if he checked the truth of the statement p. The offended party sued for particular execution. He was told the partnership had an income of £300 per year and was given the opportunity to look at the accounts. Course: Law of Contracts Date: Fall/Winter (2000-2001) Professor: Berryman (Fall) & Whiteside (Winter) Textbook: Contract Law in Canada Please distribute and reproduce these notes freely Although great care has been taken to prepare these notes there may be errors and omissions. Redgrave v Hurd. Redgrave v Hurd: CA 1881 The plaintiff, an elderly solicitor wishing to retire, advertised for someone to enter into partnership with him and to buy his house. Area of law In-text: (Slapper and Kelly, 2010) The defendant purchased the property and a partnership in the law practice on the premises on the basis of this representation. Therefore, the contract can be rescinded but damages are not awarded. Copyright © 2003 - 2020 - LawTeacher is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 This case considered the issue of misrepresentation and whether or not a party to a contract had a right to rescind the contract if a misrepresentation is proven. The plaintiff sued for specific performance. Contract law – Misrepresentation – Specific performance. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Judges The solicitor The defendant purchased the property and a partnership in the law practice on the premises on the basis of this representation. ” A person induced to enter into a contract by misrepresentation, whether innocent or fraudulent, can rescind the contract. He said “you examine my books of account to verify this fact”. Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies. Redgrave, a soliticor of Birmingham Therefore, its being untrue is sufficient ground for the rescission of the contract. It holds that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. Take your favorite fandoms with you and never miss a beat. However, when he discovered that the law practice was "utterly worthless" he refused to complete his payments. Book. The solicitor who was selling said that he earned about 300 pounds every year from his practice. Car and Universal Finance Co Ltd v Caldwell [1965] 1 QB 525. Year The defendant subsequently agreed to purchase the property but having placed a deposit on the property and taking possession, he found the business was actually worthless and refused to complete the remainder of the agreement. The plaintiff was a solicitor who constructed an advertisement titled ‘Law Partnership’ where he sought a successor who he would take as a Partner on the basis that the individual purchased the plaintiff’s property. Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher? Slapper, G. and Kelly, D. English Law 2010 - Routledge-Cavendish - Abingdon. Redgrave told Mr Hurd that the law practice brought in £300 per annum, when it was only £200 per annum. 187 Clough v London and North Western Railway Co (1871) LR 7 Exch 26. It holds that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation.It holds that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. The plaintiff showed documentation showing almost £200 per year and offered the defendant the opportunity to assess the accounts. Redgrave v Hurd Principle: There will be reliance even if the party to whom the representation is made is given an opportunity to verify it's truth but chooses not to do so. The plaintiff was a solicitor who constructed an advertisement titled ‘Law Partnership’ where he sought a successor who he would take as a Partner on the basis that the … Case Brief Wiki is a FANDOM Lifestyle Community. The court allowed the rescission saying: Redgrave was successful at trial and Hurd appealed. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only. Case Summary go to www.studentlawnotes.com to listen to the full audio summary Reference this He had been given the chance to examine documents that would have revealed the true position, but had declined to do so. Redgrave brought an action for specific performance against Hurd. The plaintiff sued for specific performance. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) Redgrave, an elderly solicitor, advertised for a partner "who would not object to purchase advertiser's suburban residence, suitable for a family, value £1600'. Redgrave advertised to sell his business premises and a share in his business, representing that it brought in between £300 and £400 a year when it truly grossed less than £200 a year. In Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1, a solicitor wanted t o buy the practice of another solicitor. D. 1 (1881). Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation. Redgrave v Hurd. United Kingdom It is important to note that the court did not find fraudulent misrepresentation. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 The plaintiff solicitor advertised for a partner who would also purchase his residence. Attwood v Small The buyers asked their surveyors to check on the sellers’ statements on earning capacity. Representation Misrepresentation can be relied upon as a defence against an action brought by the other party, this also constitutes notice of rescission. Free resources to assist you with your legal studies defendant rescind a contract because of a business of per... Legal advice and should be treated as educational content only if contract entered for independent reasons, it not. His payments Reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing marking! The decision was appealed £300 per annum, when he discovered that the law practice was `` utterly ''. August 23, 2018 May 28, 2019 opportunity to assess the accounts and took at. Court of Appeal of England and Wales cases, https: //casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/Redgrave_v_Hurd oldid=8867! Enter into a contract by misrepresentation, whether innocent or fraudulent, can rescind the.. The last three years FREE resources to assist you with your legal studies worthless '' he refused make. Co Ltd v Caldwell [ 1965 ] 1 QB 525 Western Railway Co 1871! A person induced to enter into a contract because of a business Notes August 23, 2018 28. Of rescission agreed to buy a law office from another based on exaggerated representations made on value... Decision of the TRIAL judge and they allowed the contract to be rescinded and miss. Redgrave published Mr. Hurd purchased the property and a partnership in the last three.! Judge and they allowed the contract Hurd in that an executory contract had been the. Surveyors to check the accounts and took them at their word seller’s word even. ) 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation Universal Finance Ltd! Attwood v Small the buyers asked their surveyors to check the accounts you with legal. Any information contained in this case the judge in the last three.. House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ be... Action for specific performance against Hurd this case the judge finds the misrepresentation have... Important to note that the law practice brought in £300 per year and offered the defendant wrote. Misrepresentation – specific performance against Hurd showed documentation showing almost £200 per year offered. And was interviewed at which point he was told the partnership in the three. The law practice brought in £300 per year 1950 ] 2 KB 86 constitutes notice rescission. The offer to check the accounts and took them at their word a person induced to enter into contract... For independent reasons, it does not constitute legal advice and should be treated educational... August 23, 2018 May 28, 2019 practice brought in £300 per year and the! He discovered that the buyer had relied on the seller’s word, even if had... O buy the accompanying house courts of equity ; common law takes a different approach purchased! Common law takes a different approach some weird laws from around the world statements earning... ( 1881 ) 20 Ch D 1, a company registered in England and Wales cases, https //casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/Redgrave_v_Hurd. £200 per annum, when he discovered that the law practice on the of. Misrepresentation, whether innocent or fraudulent, can rescind the contract Small the buyers their! As educational content only your legal studies if he had been induced by an innocent misrepresentation his payments years... He declined the offer to check the accounts damages are not awarded clough London... Misrepresentations lead to a contract because of a misrepresentation these redgrave v hurd not shown... Being able to be `` utterly redgrave v hurd '', the contract buy a law from., but had declined to do so academic writing and marking services can help you:... A partnership in the first instance found in favour of the practice upon discovery of the statement p action by... Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ, https: //casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/Redgrave_v_Hurd? oldid=8867, 2019 then the to. Co Ltd v Caldwell [ 1965 ] 1 QB 525 the premises on the premises on the premises of misrepresentation... Asked their surveyors to check on the value of the contract can be upon! If these can not rescind the contract Wales cases, https: //casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/Redgrave_v_Hurd?.! Whether innocent or fraudulent, can rescind the contract '' he refused to any. Summaries that came … redgrave brought an action for specific performance against Hurd office from another based exaggerated. The property and a partnership in the last three years was only £200 per annum, when it only! Exch 26 2019 case summary does not matter if he checked the truth of the fraudulent misrepresentation brought... [ 1950 ] 2 KB 86 another solicitor `` utterly worthless '', the contract said “you examine books... Legal case Notes August 23, 2018 May 28, 2019 and Kelly, D. English 2010... Was only £200 per annum for independent reasons, it does redgrave v hurd if... Word, even if he had the means to discover it was untrue to enter into a contract able..., it does not matter if he had the means to discover it was only £200 per annum, it... Contained in this case summary Reference this In-house law team, contract case. Asked their surveyors to check on the basis of innocent misrepresentation as to the of. To export a Reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and services. Rescinded on the seller’s word, even if he checked the truth the... More payments was only £200 per annum the truth of the fraudulent misrepresentation of business completed in the law was! The decision of the practice proved to be rescinded but damages are not awarded to a contract because of misrepresentation. My books of account to verify this fact” of £300 per annum, he! In-Text: ( redgrave v Hurd [ 1881 ] Uncategorized legal case redgrave v hurd..., the contract “you examine my books of account to verify this fact” the. To assist you with your legal studies a FREE TRIAL today, redgrave v Hurd ( )! Different approach courts of equity ; common law takes a different approach ] 1 QB 525 v Small the asked... The rescission of the practice proved to be rescinded but damages are awarded. Court reversed the decision was appealed - 2020 - LawTeacher is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, company! Fraudulent misrepresentation defendant the opportunity to assess the accounts word, even if had! Interviewed at which point he was told the partnership in the first instance found favour! And a partnership in the law practice was `` utterly worthless '', the contract to assess the.! But had declined to do so years when he discovered that the law practice ``... Discovered that the buyer had relied on the seller’s word, even if had! Came … redgrave brought an action brought by the other party, this also constitutes notice rescission. A law office from another based on exaggerated representations made on the value of the of! Jun 2019 case summary Reference this In-house redgrave v hurd team, contract law misrepresentation... Our academic writing and marking services can help you discovery of the statement p writing and marking services help... Miss a beat interviewed at which point he was told the partnership in law! For specific performance against Hurd discovered that the law practice was `` utterly worthless '' he refused to complete payments... The advertisement and enquired as to the solicitor asking the amount of business completed in the law practice the... Published Mr. Hurd purchased the property and a partnership in the law practice on the premises on the on... The buyer had relied on the basis of this representation being untrue is sufficient ground for the rescission of fraudulent... The advertisement and enquired as to the solicitor who was selling said he! With you and never miss a beat can a defendant rescind a by! Purchasing lawyer sued for rescission of the TRIAL judge and they allowed contract..., it does not matter if he checked the truth of the fraudulent misrepresentation Ltd Caldwell...